Miss Elle on Tumblr

  • Archive
  • RSS
  • Ask Miss Elle
banner

Activate the Mechanism!: On Birth Control & the Affordable Care Act (Obamacare)

conservative-bitchxo:

angrywomenoftumblr:

misselletv:

I’ve been reading a lot about the ACA and I notice that not everyone is up to date on what’s going down with birth control now that SCOTUS has given their ruling. So here’s a bit of info on what to expect:

  • Yes, birth control will be covered under…

“No, churches/houses of worship will be mandated to cover contraceptives. Christian hospitals, charities, universities and other religious enterprises will, however!” The first part didn’t make sense.  And is this serious? Christian hospitals and such are being forced to provide something that they’re against? Ridiculous. 

You’re right, that is supposed to be “not mandated.” Thanks for spotting the typo!

If you’re a religious enterprise, you will be required to offer it, but it will be in the insurers’ hands to provide it.

(via ericaronaldo)

Source: misselletv

    • #affordable care act
    • #obamacare
  • 10 months ago > misselletv
  • 846
  • Comments
  • Permalink
Share

Short URL

TwitterFacebookPinterestGoogle+
newsweek:

How our readers reacted to the health-care ruling. We asked them to tell us one word. Just one.
Pop-upView Separately

newsweek:

How our readers reacted to the health-care ruling. We asked them to tell us one word. Just one.

    • #bada boom
    • #affordable care act
    • #obamacare
    • #obama
    • #aca
  • 10 months ago > newsweek
  • 269
  • Comments
  • Permalink
Share

Short URL

TwitterFacebookPinterestGoogle+

Still don't get how the ACA mandate works?

The Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation has provided a helpful flow chart to guide you through it!

Notable points: if you are an undocumented immigrant, incarcerated, member of a Native America tribe or a religion group opposed to health insurance policy, you don’t have to accept the mandate or pay the penalty! Read up on it!

Source: healthreform.kff.org

    • #affordable care act
    • #obama
    • #obamacare
    • #health care
    • #health reform
    • #romney
    • #politics
  • 10 months ago
  • 7
  • Comments
  • Permalink
Share

Short URL

TwitterFacebookPinterestGoogle+

On Birth Control & the Affordable Care Act (Obamacare)

I’ve been reading a lot about the ACA and I notice that not everyone is up to date on what’s going down with birth control now that SCOTUS has given their ruling. So here’s a bit of info on what to expect:

  • Yes, birth control will be covered under the Affordable Care Act.
    The regulations made under the act rely on the Institute of Medicine for recommendations. The IOM says that “birth control is medically necessary to ensure women’s health and well-being.”
  • No, churches/houses of worship will be mandated to cover contraceptives. Christian hospitals, charities, universities and other religious enterprises will, however!
  • Yes, birth control will come straight from the insurers. So if you are a religious enterprise, it’s out of your hands!
  • No, you won’t have to co-pay for birth control. All of women’s preventive pay will be covered, including mammograms, domestic violence screenings and contraception.

Keep in mind that these affect trans* and non-binary folks as well, so this goes well beyond helping women!

Click on the source to read more about it! Click here to read up on the history between the ACA & birth control.

    • #birth control
    • #contraceptive rights
    • #affordable care act
    • #obama care
  • 10 months ago
  • 846
  • Comments
  • Permalink
Share

Short URL

TwitterFacebookPinterestGoogle+

What exactly is PPACA and what does it change?

thepoliticalfreakshow:

abaldwin360:

abaldwin360:

big thanks to reddit user CaspianX2 for typing all this out!

What people call “Obamacare” is actually the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act. However, people were calling it “Obamacare” before everyone even hammered out what it would be. It’s a term mostly used by people who don’t like the PPaACA, and it’s become popularized in part because PPaACA is a really long and awkward name, even when you turn it into an acronym like that.

Anyway, the PPaACA made a bunch of new rules regarding health care, with the purpose of making health care more affordable for everyone. Opponents of the PPaACA, on the other hand, feel that the rules it makes take away too many freedoms and force people (both individuals and businesses) to do things they shouldn’t have to.

So what does it do? Well, here is everything, in the order of when it goes into effect (because some of it happens later than other parts of it):

Already in effect:

  • It allows the Food and Drug Administration to approve more generic drugs (making for more competition in the market to drive down prices)

  • It increases the rebates on drugs people get through Medicare (so drugs cost less)

  • It establishes a non-profit group, that the government doesn’t directly control, to study different kinds of treatments to see what works better and is the best use of money.

  • It makes chain restaurants like McDonalds display how many calories are in all of their foods, so people can have an easier time making choices to eat healthy.

  • It makes a “high-risk pool” for people with pre-existing conditions. Basically, this is a way to slowly ease into getting rid of “pre-existing conditions” altogether. For now, people who already have health issues that would be considered “pre-existing conditions” can still get insurance, but at different rates than people without them.

  • It renews some old policies, and calls for the appointment of various positions.

  • It creates a new 10% tax on indoor tanning booths.

  • It says that health insurance companies can no longer tell customers that they won’t get any more coverage because they have hit a “lifetime limit”. Basically, if someone has paid for life insurance, that company can’t tell that person that he’s used that insurance too much throughout his life so they won’t cover him any more. They can’t do this for lifetime spending, and they’re limited in how much they can do this for yearly spending.

  • Kids can continue to be covered by their parents’ health insurance until they’re 26.

  • No more “pre-existing conditions” for kids under the age of 19.

  • Insurers have less ability to change the amount customers have to pay for their plans.

  • People in a “Medicare Gap” get a rebate to make up for the extra money they would otherwise have to spend.

  • Insurers can’t just drop customers once they get sick.

  • Insurers have to tell customers what they’re spending money on. (Instead of just “administrative fee”, they have to be more specific).

  • Insurers need to have an appeals process for when they turn down a claim, so customers have some manner of recourse other than a lawsuit when they’re turned down.

  • New ways to stop fraud are created.

  • Medicare extends to smaller hospitals.

  • Medicare patients with chronic illnesses must be monitored more thoroughly.

  • Reduces the costs for some companies that handle benefits for the elderly.

  • A new website is made to give people insurance and health information.

  • A credit program is made that will make it easier for business to invest in new ways to treat illness.

  • A limit is placed on just how much of a percentage of the money an insurer makes can be profit, to make sure they’re not price-gouging customers.

  • A limit is placed on what type of insurance accounts can be used to pay for over-the-counter drugs without a prescription. Basically, your insurer isn’t paying for the Aspirin you bought for that hangover.

  • Employers need to list the benefits they provided to employees on their tax forms.

8/1/2012

  • Any health plans sold after this date must provide preventative care (mammograms, colonoscopies, etc.) without requiring any sort of co-pay or charge.

1/1/2013

  • If you make over $200,000 a year, your taxes go up a tiny bit (0.9%)

1/1/2014

This is when a lot of the really big changes happen.

  • No more “pre-existing conditions”. At all. People will be charged the same regardless of their medical history.

  • If you can afford insurance but do not get it, you will be charged a fee. This is the “mandate” that people are talking about. Basically, it’s a trade-off for the “pre-existing conditions” bit, saying that since insurers now have to cover you regardless of what you have, you can’t just wait to buy insurance until you get sick. Otherwise no one would buy insurance until they needed it. You can opt not to get insurance, but you’ll have to pay the fee instead, unless of course you’re not buying insurance because you just can’t afford it.

  • Insurer’s now can’t do annual spending caps. Their customers can get as much health care in a given year as they need.

  • Make it so more poor people can get Medicare by making the low-income cut-off higher.

  • Small businesses get some tax credits for two years.

  • Businesses with over 50 employees must offer health insurance to full-time employees, or pay a penalty.

  • Limits how high of an annual deductible insurers can charge customers.

  • Cut some Medicare spending

  • Place a $2500 limit on tax-free spending on FSAs (accounts for medical spending). Basically, people using these accounts now have to pay taxes on any money over $2500 they put into them.

  • Establish health insurance exchanges and rebates for the lower-class, basically making it so poor people can get some medical coverage.

  • Congress and Congressional staff will only be offered the same insurance offered to people in the insurance exchanges, rather than Federal Insurance. Basically, we won’t be footing their health care bills any more than any other American citizen.

  • A new tax on pharmaceutical companies.

  • A new tax on the purchase of medical devices.

  • A new tax on insurance companies based on their market share. Basically, the more of the market they control, the more they’ll get taxed.

  • The amount you can deduct from your taxes for medical expenses increases.

1/1/2015

  • Doctors’ pay will be determined by the quality of their care, not how many people they treat.

1/1/2017

  • If any state can come up with their own plan, one which gives citizens the same level of care at the same price as the PPaACA, they can ask the Secretary of Health and Human Resources for permission to do their plan instead of the PPaACA. So if they can get the same results without, say, the mandate, they can be allowed to do so. Vermont, for example, has expressed a desire to just go straight to single-payer (in simple terms, everyone is covered, and medical expenses are paid by taxpayers).

2018

  • All health care plans must now cover preventative care (not just the new ones).

  • A new tax on “Cadillac” health care plans (more expensive plans for rich people who want fancier coverage).

2020

  • The elimination of the “Medicare gap”

.

Aaaaand that’s it right there.

The biggest thing opponents of the bill have against it is the mandate. They claim that it forces people to buy insurance, and forcing people to buy something in unconstitutional. Personally, I take the opposite view, as it’s not telling people to buy a specific thing, just to have a specific type of thing, just like a part of the money we pay in taxes pays for the police and firemen who protect us, this would have us paying to ensure doctors can treat us for illness and injury.

Plus, as previously mentioned, it’s necessary if you’re doing away with “pre-existing conditions” because otherwise no one would get insurance until they needed to use it, which defeats the purpose of insurance.

Reblogging to put back on the blog’s front page.

Very detailed and excellent summary of the bill that millions of Americans don’t have a clue about!!

For anyone out there looking for a longer summary of a sorts!

(via justinspoliticalcorner)

Source: abaldwin360

    • #affordable care act
    • #politics
  • 10 months ago > abaldwin360
  • 14629
  • Comments
  • Permalink
Share

Short URL

TwitterFacebookPinterestGoogle+

Is anyone else really bothered in the aftermaths of votes like this?

One thing that really makes me pause is when either side tries to lay claim to something. It happened with the SB 1070 (Arizona immigration law) ruling and it’s happening here—hundreds of media sites going back in forth about whether or not this is a win for Obama or a loss for Romney, as opposed to a win for everyone who doesn’t have affordable health care. While I totally understand how individual issues play out in campaigns and in the forthcoming election, I’m starting to get really annoyed with the “war rhetoric” that’s been flying about.

I think simplifying often complex votes in a manner of win-lose is kind of easier to explain on a talk show but kind of harmful to the larger groups of who this affects. In the case of SB 1070, I was upset with how people easily regulated immigration issues as “Hispanic/Latino issues” and assumed that entire group as a whole could be swayed to either side depending on the results of the ruling. I mean, the Latino community is heavily affected by immigration policy in this country, but that doesn’t mean that other groups are not affected; I follow some African and South Asian immigrants on Tumblr and it’s annoying to watch their issues get wiped out.

I think what bothers me here is the way the media relates to POC when it comes to politics—in that there’s a persuasive idea that one issue is the mainstay of each community so that’s all you have to ever market to them. It makes me queasy to think of the Latino community as pawns under the grip of immigration, that either side can expect this or that for themifand onlyifthey discuss or care about immigration.

At least in the realm of the ACA ruling, this is something that can (and will) be easily marketed to everyone, but I don’t know. There’s just something about the rhetoric here I don’t like.

    • #affordable care act
    • #SB 1070
    • #immigration law
    • #immigration policy
    • #obama
    • #romney
  • 10 months ago
  • 4
  • Comments
  • Permalink
Share

Short URL

TwitterFacebookPinterestGoogle+
Pop-up View Separately
Pop-up View Separately
Pop-up View Separately
Pop-up View Separately
PreviousNext

newsweek:

futurejournalismproject:

Everyone Slow Down, Redux Edition

This is an update to our post earlier this morning about slowing down, digesting and getting things right before rushing to report.

CNN didn’t and instead ran banner headlines on its site about the Supreme Court striking down the individual mandate.

Fox too but, well, somehow that’s less surprising.

The shadows on these Twitter screengrabs are a nice touch.

But on the real, I need CNN to get its shit together. Today will forever be known as “The Mistake Heard Around the World.”

Source: futurejournalismproject

    • #cnn
    • #affordable care act
    • #president obama
    • #obama
  • 10 months ago > futurejournalismproject
  • 381
  • Comments
  • Permalink
Share

Short URL

TwitterFacebookPinterestGoogle+

No really….wait….what?

fuckyeahsexeducation:

idontmakemonkeys:

fuckyeahsexeducation:

missgingerlee:

Is it bad that I want to comment on the forums of the class I’m taking on ACA telling all the people bashing it that they can suck it now?

Seriously, I don’t even care if it’s constitutional at this point, I just want to be able to actually get health care.

You don’t care if it’s constitutional, you just want healthcare. Wow. This is just so typical. I don’t care whose rights you’re stomping on to give me what I want, I just want it now!

I don’t know how the ACA stomps on anyone’s rights. I just would like to not be in excruciating pain 24/7 which is happening under the current system. The constitution is a living document. We amend it when it doesn’t cover something that we the people need. We the people need this. If it’s not constitutional right now we need to make it so. People die every day in the U.S. because they don’t have health care. 

The individual mandate was what made the ACA “unconstitutional” before, but that’s been modified. People felt it was unfair to force them to buy insurance, but the Supreme Court ruled that you literally have the power to opt out of the mandate and pay a tax.

So whose rights are we stomping on again?

Source: missgingerlee

    • #affordable care act
    • #obamacare
    • #politics
    • #obama
    • #president obama
  • 10 months ago > missgingerlee
  • 55
  • Comments
  • Permalink
Share

Short URL

TwitterFacebookPinterestGoogle+
On Obamacare & You
For anyone out there still trying to make sense of this thing! Get live updates at Bloomberg Law.
Pop-upView Separately

On Obamacare & You

For anyone out there still trying to make sense of this thing! Get live updates at Bloomberg Law.

    • #politics
    • #affordable care act
    • #obama
    • #president obama
    • #supreme court
    • #miss elle
    • #infographic
    • #bloomberg law
  • 10 months ago
  • 46
  • Comments
  • Permalink
Share

Short URL

TwitterFacebookPinterestGoogle+

Portrait/Logo

New episode every Sunday at 5pm/4pm central!

Hi, I'm Miss Elle! I'm all about politics and pop culture.

Miss Elle is a weekly politics/pop culture talk show hosted on YouTube. The main focus is to make politics accessible, interesting and understandable! Let's talk politics!

Pages

  • Miss Elle on Youtube
  • About Miss Elle
  • Explain This!
  • FAQ

Find me on:

  • missellespeaks on Youtube

Top

  • RSS
  • Random
  • Archive
  • Ask Miss Elle
  • Mobile
Effector Theme by Pixel Union