Episode 5: Miss Elle on Blocking the Vote!
Think you have the right to vote? Think again! There’s been a lot of talk about voters suppression bills on Tumblr, so I’m here to help you through them. Know your states’ laws & get yourself registered!
Subscribe to me on YouTube (if you wanna!)/Contribute to Explain This!
Thanks for watching! Feel free to pass it around!
I’ve been reading a lot about the ACA and I notice that not everyone is up to date on what’s going down with birth control now that SCOTUS has given their ruling. So here’s a bit of info on what to expect:
- Yes, birth control will be covered under…
Anyone know exactly WHICH versions of birth control? Like, will JUST the Pill be covered? Or ALL forms of birth control?? I’m on the Patch and know it’s more expensive than the Pill atm so I’m curious.
What a great question!
From what I know there was a mandate issued in January 2012 that used the FDA’s definition of birth control. No idea if that same definition will be used in the ACA, but since the patch follows under preventive care, I see no real reason why it shouldn’t be covered!
Source: misselletv
How our readers reacted to the health-care ruling. We asked them to tell us one word. Just one.
The Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation has provided a helpful flow chart to guide you through it!
Notable points: if you are an undocumented immigrant, incarcerated, member of a Native America tribe or a religion group opposed to health insurance policy, you don’t have to accept the mandate or pay the penalty! Read up on it!
Source: healthreform.kff.org
Is anyone else really bothered in the aftermaths of votes like this?
One thing that really makes me pause is when either side tries to lay claim to something. It happened with the SB 1070 (Arizona immigration law) ruling and it’s happening here—hundreds of media sites going back in forth about whether or not this is a win for Obama or a loss for Romney, as opposed to a win for everyone who doesn’t have affordable health care. While I totally understand how individual issues play out in campaigns and in the forthcoming election, I’m starting to get really annoyed with the “war rhetoric” that’s been flying about.
I think simplifying often complex votes in a manner of win-lose is kind of easier to explain on a talk show but kind of harmful to the larger groups of who this affects. In the case of SB 1070, I was upset with how people easily regulated immigration issues as “Hispanic/Latino issues” and assumed that entire group as a whole could be swayed to either side depending on the results of the ruling. I mean, the Latino community is heavily affected by immigration policy in this country, but that doesn’t mean that other groups are not affected; I follow some African and South Asian immigrants on Tumblr and it’s annoying to watch their issues get wiped out.
I think what bothers me here is the way the media relates to POC when it comes to politics—in that there’s a persuasive idea that one issue is the mainstay of each community so that’s all you have to ever market to them. It makes me queasy to think of the Latino community as pawns under the grip of immigration, that either side can expect this or that for themifand onlyifthey discuss or care about immigration.
At least in the realm of the ACA ruling, this is something that can (and will) be easily marketed to everyone, but I don’t know. There’s just something about the rhetoric here I don’t like.
Everyone Slow Down, Redux Edition
This is an update to our post earlier this morning about slowing down, digesting and getting things right before rushing to report.
CNN didn’t and instead ran banner headlines on its site about the Supreme Court striking down the individual mandate.
Fox too but, well, somehow that’s less surprising.
The shadows on these Twitter screengrabs are a nice touch.
But on the real, I need CNN to get its shit together. Today will forever be known as “The Mistake Heard Around the World.”
Source: futurejournalismproject
Is it bad that I want to comment on the forums of the class I’m taking on ACA telling all the people bashing it that they can suck it now?
Seriously, I don’t even care if it’s constitutional at this point, I just want to be able to actually get health care.
You don’t care if it’s constitutional, you just want healthcare. Wow. This is just so typical. I don’t care whose rights you’re stomping on to give me what I want, I just want it now!
I don’t know how the ACA stomps on anyone’s rights. I just would like to not be in excruciating pain 24/7 which is happening under the current system. The constitution is a living document. We amend it when it doesn’t cover something that we the people need. We the people need this. If it’s not constitutional right now we need to make it so. People die every day in the U.S. because they don’t have health care.
The individual mandate was what made the ACA “unconstitutional” before, but that’s been modified. People felt it was unfair to force them to buy insurance, but the Supreme Court ruled that you literally have the power to opt out of the mandate and pay a tax.
So whose rights are we stomping on again?
Source: missgingerlee
On Obamacare & You
For anyone out there still trying to make sense of this thing! Get live updates at Bloomberg Law.
Although these aren’t so much clapbacks as they are thoughts I have, here are some stories I ran across today that are crusin’ for a bruisin’:
(Or, How to Stop Worrying and Accept the Inevitable)
Bloomberg Businessweek posted an interesting article on (yet again) why young voters might not vote as much for President Obama in the 2012 election and I have to wonder why we keep wondering. I’m sure part of this phenomenon has to do with concern for Obama’s admittedly dwindled base, but I’m also starting to suspect that there’s been an underlying idea that young people are always ripe for the picking when it comes to politics. Surprise, they’re not!
Look, the downgrade in enthusiasm was bound to happen. Reelection campaigns are kind of like action-thriller-horror movie sequels: never as good as the first movie (but probably a lot more gory) and not everyone’s rushing out to theaters to see it. If it seems like a lot of young people are waiting for the Blu-ray special of the 2012 election campaign, it’s because they are. What occurred in 2008 was a masterpiece of an election, but it’s definitely not something that can or will be repeated.
And why should it be? So many issues being debated (or filibustered) in Congress today affect plenty of young people, and it is possible that Obama hasn’t lived up to everyone’s expectations constantly. Not to say that his lack of commitment in some areas should equal his 2012 downfall, but that people have a right to be frustrated with him. Young people have a right to be disaffected. They have a right to not care.
If President Obama or Mitt Romney plan to dredge up any kind of young people enthusiasm this year, they’ll need to start taking our worries and cares a lot more seriously. No more playing around with health care or abortion rights or yes, even immigration policy. Stop searching for another 2008, and start focusing on the right now.
-Miss Elle
What do you guys think? Should the media be so heavily concerned with a 2008 part 2? Do you feel disaffected or unenthusiastic about the 2012 elections? Why?
Hi, I'm Miss Elle! I'm all about politics and pop culture.
Miss Elle is a weekly politics/pop culture talk show hosted on YouTube. The main focus is to make politics accessible, interesting and understandable! Let's talk politics!
Top
